Bring exceptional work forward
Anyone may introduce work through the public inquiry form using their own email. Existing account holders can also save private working submissions. Formal entry follows approved eligibility and a published call.
The Moonshot Prize model brings open pathways, structured evidence and independent human judgment together. Every step should strengthen trust.
Anyone may introduce work through the public inquiry form using their own email. Existing account holders can also save private working submissions. Formal entry follows approved eligibility and a published call.
The team checks completeness and readiness for a future cycle. Submissions should include original sources, relevant evaluations, attribution, known limitations and supporting documents.
Administrators assign reviewers. Each reviewer must disclose conflicts before evaluating the evidence. Reviewers with a disclosed conflict recuse themselves from scoring.
The four-question intake rubric supports screening. A formal competition requires field-specific evidence gates, an adopted rubric and independent verification. Written reasons and human judgment determine recommendations, not an automated score.
The designated committee considers the evidence, reviews, due diligence and reasons for its recommendation. Award decisions require a formally established authority and funded prize cycle.
The intended model pairs recognition with an agreed plan for learning, reporting and continued progress. Any funding, milestones and support are set out in separate approved agreements.
Families can help define a mission and support a field. They cannot purchase favorable review, finalist status or an award. Conflicts and private information are handled through restricted workspaces.
Read our founding principlesRead the full consultation rulebook →
Share an early inquiry and review the proposed rules before a formal call opens.